Some things never change. Some things change a lot.
Category Archives: Singapore
List of Singapore Private Companies Offering Storage Space
1. Extra Space
www.extraspace.com.sg
Hotline: 6304 3200
Extra Space IMM Jurong Building
2 Jurong East St 21
#02-71 IMM Building
Singapore 609601
Tel: 6304 3208
Fax: 6491 1244
Email: imm@extraspace.com.sg
Extra Space Clementi Ave 6 West Coast
No. 1 Clementi Loop
#02-03
Singapore 129808
Tel: 6304 3211
Fax: 6491 1245
Email: westcoast@extraspace.com.sg
2. Store-It! Self Storage
www.store-it.com.sg
Pasir Panjang Road Facility
Harbourside 1
1 Boon Leat Terrace
Singapore 119843
Tel: 6271 2762
Fax: 6271 2393
Email: info@store-it.com.sg
3. Lock and Store
www.lockandstore.com.sg
37 Keppel Road (opp. Singapore Railway Station)
#01-03 Tanjong Pagar Distripark
Singapore 089064
Tel: 6325 7351
Fax: 6224 9041
E: info@LockAndStore.com.sg
the mrbrown show: oh army!
Michelle Chong
As a Bukit Timah housewife
As a concerned parent / NUS student
As a PRC entertainer
As a Filipino maid
As a sarong party girl
ST: Singapore workers ‘world’s unhappiest’
May 30, 2011
Singapore workers ‘world’s unhappiest’
Survey of 14 countries finds local employees are also the least loyal
By Melissa Ho
HATE your work? Dread going in on Monday? Considering quitting your job?
Well, you are not alone. Most of the Singapore workforce is with you, according to one survey.
A poll of employee attitudes in 14 countries has ranked Singapore last in workplace happiness. Unsurprisingly, this correlates to loyalty to employers, where Singapore is again ranked at the rear.
Talent management company Lumesse polled about 4,000 employees from a wide variety of industries.
People were asked about how happy they were at work, whether they felt their skills were properly utilised, the career paths open to them, and the training and career development opportunities they had.
The results put Singapore last in three major areas – we least enjoy going to work, are the least loyal and have the least supportive workplaces.
Only 17 per cent of Singapore’s workforce see themselves staying with their current employer forever. The global average is 35 per cent.
‘Clearly, very few employees feel bonded to their companies. This is going to be a problem as companies are not getting the full potential of workers,’ said Mr Rolf Bezemer, Lumesse’s managing director for Singapore, Malaysia and Australia.
At the same time, only 19 per cent of those polled in Singapore look forward to their work each day, compared to the global average of 30 per cent.
When it comes to positive and supportive workplaces, only a paltry 12 per cent vouch that they exist in Singapore. Globally, 20 per cent believe so.
Mr Bezemer attributes Singapore’s poor showing to the lack of transparency and consistency in workplaces here and an absence of stimulating jobs.
Ms Wong Su-Yen, senior partner and Asean managing director for human resources consultancy firm Mercer, said: ‘Strong economic growth in Singapore has led to increased job opportunities, so organisations must work harder than ever to attract and retain people.’
Mr Phillip Overmyer, chief executive at Singapore International Chamber of Commerce, agreed: ‘There are so many opportunities to be employed (in Singapore) that people don’t mind job hopping as they know they can always find something equally good, if not better, elsewhere.’
That might suggest that monetary incentives are the way forward but money does not always make the world go round.
The Lumesse survey found that Singapore performed well on pay, with 14 per cent commenting that their salaries have gone up by at least 20 per cent over five years. The global average is 9 per cent.
Yet people are still leaving.
Ms Majella Slevin, manager for secretarial and support division at human resources firm Robert Walters, added: ‘People stay in jobs also for a good work-life balance and clear career paths.’
They must also feel that they are valued employees, she added
Sales assistant Janice Lin, who turns 26 this year, ‘hopped’ five times before landing her current job.
‘It’s very common for young adults to try out different things for novelty’s sake. A lot of my friends do it,’ she said.
She estimates that an average working person like her will job-hop three times, staying in each place for about a year, before settling down.
In today’s talent-scarce society, perhaps this should be taken as only natural. Rather than fight it, embrace it.
Do not focus on seeking long-term employment from all employees, advises Mr Josh Goh, assistant director, corporate services, for HR firm The GMP Group.
Instead, he said: ‘Focus efforts on building a strong employer brand by harnessing the best from employees during their employment.’
Ric O’Barry

Richard (Ric) O’Barry (born c. 1939) was first recognized in the 1960s for capturing and training the five dolphins that were used in the well-known TV series Flipper. O’Barry made a radical transition from training dolphins in captivity to assertively combating the captivity industry soon after Kathy, one of the Flipper dolphins, died, committing suicide in his arms, according to O’Barry.
‘Kathy looked me right in the eye,’ he said. ‘Then she took a breath, and never took another one. She sank to the bottom of the tank,’ he recalled, adding that he was quite certain that her death was a suicide.
He explained: ‘Every breath a dolphin takes is a conscious effort, so they can decide not to take the next breath. That’s what I mean by suicide.’
It was just before Earth Day, 1970. The next day, he found himself in jail for trying to free a dolphin.
‘I completely lost it,’ he admitted in a phone interview with The Sunday Times. He went on to set up the Dolphin Project to free captive dolphins and educate people about their plight.
For years, he had been trying to get the media to focus attention on what happened to the dolphins in Taiji, Japan. He managed to do that in 2009, when he worked with film-maker Louie Psihoyos.
The Cove went on to win Best Documentary at the Oscars.
In the documentary on the annual hunt of wild dolphins in Taiji, fishermen in boats bang pipes underwater. Fleeing this sound, the dolphins are corralled into a secluded cove.
The healthy ones are caught to be sold to aquariums but the others are speared, clubbed and stabbed to death, as recorded in the documentary, portions of which were shot secretly.
Mr O’Barry said the dolphin hunts in the Solomon Islands are no different. The residents use stones to create a sound that enables the hunters to drive the dolphins into an inlet.
‘The dolphins are ripped from their natural environment, separated from their families and pod mates, held in nets, transported in trucks, hoisted into cargo planes and flown to distant locations. Is it any wonder that many die in the process?’
Survivors are ‘condemned to a life in a concrete tank, listening to the hum of the filtration system and the screams of the audience’.
While wild dolphins can live for 60 years, in captivity they often die prematurely. Captive ones routinely suffer from ulcers, he said, adding that they frequently go blind and have skin problems.
Many also succumb to stress-related conditions like pneumonia, as well as self-inflicted injuries or those caused by accidents or confrontations with other confined dolphins.
Mr O’Barry, who works with US-based environmental group Earth Island Institute, said he will never give up the fight to free dolphins in captivity.
‘It’s my way of trying to right the wrong I committed in helping to boost the captivity industry through the Flipper series.’
Thank You Mr Chiam
On Thrift : MM Lee Kuan Yew

‘I see no reason why I should impress people by having a big car or changing my suits every now and again to keep up with the latest styles.’
MM Lee is known in Singapore for his simple, down-to-earth lifestyle. He lives in a house which has not been renovated for decades in Oxley Road, prime real estate in the city area. He wears the same worsted wool suits when travelling on planes to go overseas. He was, in a sense, an ecologically conscious consumer long before such a concept became fashionable. Never in favour of the disposable society, he believes in the value of thrift, not over-consuming resources. The day this interview took place, he was wearing a jacket so old, he confessed that the man who tailored it for him had died. His lifestyle is so spartan, he considers it an extravagance for the Prime Minister to wear a new shirt each year for the National Day Rally.
Do you try to recycle?
We haven’t got the system of different dustbins for different items. Our people have yet to understand and would not be able to do it: Bottles, tins, food go into different chutes and bags. We’ll get there sometime.
Another part of being environmentally conscious is not to consume so much, and you’re not particularly a great consumer?
No, I’m not. I eat less, I travel less. I wonder whether I’m right in buying my car. Even if I travelled by the best Mercedes-Benz taxi limousine, it’ll cost me less than what my Lexus is costing me every day. Except that I don’t know what time I’m going to wake up, and take the one kilometre to office, one kilometre back. My car is five years old and it’s only done 20,000km.
In photographs we can see that your wardrobe, your shirts, seem to have been kept for years, decades. You don’t throw away your stuff.
Why should I throw something away which I’m comfortable with? I’m not interested in impressing anybody.
I had a supervisor who taught me criminal law. He used to be a lecturer but, you know, he became old, so he only did supervisions and he had a fireplace that did not give out any smoke because he was gassed in the First World War, and he had a lung problem. He also had a large family. He had leather patches on his coat elbows, knees of his trousers. One student was bold enough to ask him, ‘Sir, are you lacking in clothing?’ He took it gracefully. He laughed and said, ‘That college porter at the gate has to be dressed well. He wears a top hat, always to look smart. I don’t have to dress to impress anybody.’
As I listened to that, I said, ‘It’s inverted snobbery.’ But it makes sense. I see no reason why I should impress people by having a big car or changing my suits every now and again to keep up with the latest styles.
The trouble is my wardrobe is now full up. I’ve got many new suits that are absolutely in good condition because I seldom wear them. I don’t go to office every day wearing a suit, except for formal functions or when I am abroad. They are of finest worsted wool. In fact, the older I get, the less willing I am to spend time putting on a suit and tie. I just have a blouson or a buttoned-up Chinese jacket, and it saves a lot of trouble. I have had them for many years and they are very comfortable.
Isn’t it a virtue though?
No, it is not. You may say it’s a virtue, others think, why is this chap that thrifty? Watch other prime ministers. They always have new ties, new shirts and suits to look good on TV.
I mean, you look at our Prime Minister. He wears a new shirt every year for the National Day Rally. Look, I have no reason to want to impress anybody.
May I ask, how many years have you had your jacket?
This one? It’s a very comfortable jacket. The man who tailored it for me is dead.
How many years have you had it?
I can’t remember now. Nearly two decades or 15 years. And it’s very comfortable.
Song for Singapore by Corrinne May
M1 Abrams vs Leopard 2 Main Battle Tanks
The Singapore Army has acquired a total of 96 ex-German Leopard 2A4s, including 30 spare tanks. Upgraded with additional AMAP composite armour in 2010 by IBD & ST Kinetics and was renamed L2SG in October 2010.
Across the World with the Singapore Girl
Singapore Airlines (SIA) has unveiled its “Across the World” campaign by creative agency TBWA Singapore. MEC is the media agency for the campaign. The iconic Singapore Girl is the protagonist of the TVC, interacting with people in four cities seamlessly flowing into each other. What appears to be a one-take shot is a product of location shoots in China, France, India and the United States, showing the diversity of SIA’s destinations.
“Contrary to popular belief, the Singapore Girl was never excluded from Singapore Airlines’ ads as we recognize the strong emotional connection our customers had with our brand as a result of the iconic image of the Singapore Girl,” said SIA. “Our new campaign showcases the Singapore Girl’s Asian hospitality and world-class service standards while bringing the romance of travel to life. By having the Singapore Girl front our latest campaign, we hope to remind our customers and the public of these attributes that sets us apart from other carriers – excellent onboard service that can only be provided by SIA.”
LHZB Interview with Chen Show Mao

The following is a translation of the report on Lianhe Zaobao on 3 April 2011. The first part is a translation from Lianhe Zaobao reporter, Yew Lun Tian’s Facebook page. The report is an exclusive interview the Chinese paper had with Workers’ Party potential candidate, Mr Chen Show Mao.

In the middle of last month, when news first broke in the media about corporate lawyer Chen Show Mao’s emergence as a possible Workers’ Party candidate in the coming elections, he swiftly became the focus of intense local media attention and was widely spoken about as Workers’ Party’s “trump card”.
In an exclusive interview with Lianhe Zaobao two days ago, he shed his secretive low-profile and broke his silence for the first time. Unused to media scrutiny, he displayed a certain degree of nervousness, but given his highly effective bi-lingual skills, he was able to articulate fluently and clearly his ideas in Chinese throughout the two hour interview. Breaking his silence for the first time, he spoke about his decision to come home, the reasons for joining opposition politics and also his decision to join the Workers’ Party.
There is a Confucian saying that you know your destiny when you turn 50 years old. Chen Show Mao believes that he is quite fortunate to be in a position to make this decision. He describes this as “the second half of his life”. He said firmly, “I have to give back to the society”.
Growing up, Chen has received plenty of help from the community. A recipient of the Rhodes Scholarship, commonly known as the “world’s oldest and most prestigious international graduate scholarship”, he said he wants to “fight the world’s fight”, in the words of Cecil Rhodes in his will.
“Besides taking care of ourselves and our family, we have an obligation to this world and the society at large. This is my conviction. I am no different from everyone, in the past. I had spent my time and energy on my work. Who would not want to be recognized within the mainstream values and be perceived as a successful individual? However, I think I have reached a different stage in my life, this is the second half, I want to play the game in a different way”, said Chen Show-Mao.
As someone recognized at the top of his profession, and someone who has extensive experience in the US, China and Hong Kong markets, Chen Show-Mao deeply understands the power of capital. But he has chosen to come back to Singapore, where his home is, and he will be joining the opposition lacking in intangible political capital. From business to politics, from a position of strength to a position of weakness, it is clear that his life will never be the same again.
He said, “I had the chance to work on the biggest, the most complex and the top deals in the world, I can say that with pride to whoever questions me. I am entering the second-half of my life; I should do something that is meaningful and challenging.”
This meaningful and challenging job is to participate in the building of democracy in Singapore, to promote and build a rational, practical and well-respected opposition party, to let it play the role of a watchdog more effectively. With this in place, Singapore can then look forward to forming a “first world” parliament that corresponds to its “first world” economic status.
He said, “We do not have a viable alternative today. We have 82 versus 2 (the distribution of parliament seats between the ruling party and the opposition), asking the latter to form the government is unrealistic in the short term, but it doesn’t mean that it is not our objective. For people like me, participating in opposition politics, committing to the work of democratic development is more meaningful, precisely because we need to reverse this disadvantaged situation. ”
“I hope to work together with my predecessors and people who decide to join in later, in promoting the workings of this democracy. What is the ultimate aim? It is still about the livelihoods of our people, we hope everyone’s life would become better, we hope the government can make better policies.”
Against the backdrop of livelihood matters that have always been key to election results, the effectiveness of Chen’s appeal to higher political ideals is yet to be known at the grassroots level. However, he has been an “action figure” and a leader since his student days. In ACS, he was once the vice class representative; in NJC, he was a member of the Student Council; and during NS, he was a platoon commander and Staff Officer. During his third year in Harvard, he founded the “First-year Urban Program” with his peers, to encourage first year students to volunteer their services at less privileged communities in the neighbourhood – a program that remains active till today.
To Chen, to lead by example through concrete action is the key to practise his beliefs. One day in 2007, he walked in the HQ of WP to evaluate his decision of joining politics, which marks the start of his relationship with WP. He realises that his beliefs are in sync with those of WP’s and made the decision to join them. During his time back in Singapore, he has participated actively in WP’s activities, including selling WP newsletters and walkabouts.
While he cannot confirm whether he will be a candidate for a GRC or SMC, he admitted that he has visited Aljunied, East Coast, Moulmein, etc.
Chen is ready to move his work and life back to Singapore, and the “second half” of his life will perhaps be spent taking part in WP work for the next 15 to 20 years. Although his family is worried for him, Chen is preparing them mentally, “If I get elected, it is logical that I have my base in Singapore to serve the community. If I fail, it means that there is much more to do, and not less. Then I will also move back to Singapore to handle WP matters, in preparation for the next election.”
Since receiving his doctorate in 1992, Chen has worked in Hong Kong twice, and also a few years in the New York HQ during these stints. Since 2007, he has been a resident in Beijing. After being abroad for many years, Chen remains attached to Singapore. He visits Singapore four to five times every year for the past five years. To Chen, this comes naturally, just like how he served NS despite not being a citizen yet during those days, simply because “this is what Singaporeans do”.
He said, “My life has been smooth-sailing, but I feel that my path from here may not be this brightly lit and obstacle-free, and I may not be able to get to my destination.
“But this is my home, it’s almost been 30 years (abroad), and no matter where people are, they will have to go home eventually.”
Does having an opposition equates to having an insurance with an upgrade package?
The Singapore government administration and policy execution has an excellent track record and is well-known for its efficiency, so much so that it is almost like a famous international brand. There is a common concept that a multi-party parliament may affect this efficiency. But Chen Show Mao disagrees with that notion. He believes that a party that monopolises that parliament will create instability in the system, and the electorate “might as well use the 49% of their votes to buy an insurance and an upgrade.”
In his eyes, the PAP only needs 51% for a majority in parliament, hence voters should not “waste” that 49% of their votes, and should give them to opposition parties instead.
This will provide insurance for the country, because this will support sufficient numbers of opposition party members to enter parliament and allow them to gain experience and a chance to serve the people. When the day comes that the ruling party or system is unable to perform to expectations, a capable opposition party will be in place to take over.
For the long term, Chen believes that this can help in the advancement of democracy. Chen firmly believes that an effective democractic system with the inclusion of multiple parties will bring about a government that produces better policies, which in turn is beneficial to the livelihood of the general population.
This is an area that draws most of Chen’s attention. He says, “If there is a choice, you need to make a little sacrifice, you need to develop this opposition party. Unless you are willing to entrust everything and anything to a group of decision-makers.”
“But I feel that, for one, this is not a mainstream idea held globally. And for two, no matter which aspects of life you look at, progress is brought about by competition. There is no reason that this rule doesn’t apply to the government.”
As for why supporting opposition parties constitute an upgrade package for the PAP, Chen stresses the importance of competition. Only when there is competition, will the ruling party feel the pressure to work hard to serve the nation. When that happens, Singaporeans have received a “service upgrade”.
Citing the example of the foreign talent labour policy, Chen believes that there was insufficient discussion before the implementation of the policy, resulting in problems that include an inability to deal with the congestion and depression of wages.
While Chen admits that it is easy to provide criticisms, he does not deny the lack of resources and favourable conditions are playing a part too. It is therefore difficult to implement plans and policies according to one’s political vision, but he believes that everything has to start somewhere.
Hee says, “Griping, complaining, venting frustration is not a special privilege of opposition parties, this is a national phenomenon. But putting it in perspective, these opposition party members are willing to stand for elections, they are already taking action. When they get elected, there will be more resources, time and legality to take further actions, and to contribute to building a democracy.”
“Just like what is mentioned in the The Great Learning [part of The Four Classics], there is no way that a person learns how to have kids and bring them up before getting married. Some things have to happen before other things can follow suit.”
He hopes that he can provide impetus for more people to join opposition parties, by following the footsteps of his predecessors who have bravely come forward to push for reforms. Quoting Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew among those predecessors whom he hopes to learn from, he says, “The PAP was once an opposition party.”
———-
Part 3
Compared with new PAP candidates in this elections, Chen Show Mao too has rock solid credentials coming in. He was the top student in the 1979 ‘A’ Levels Examinations, graduated from Harvard, Oxford and Stanford, and is the recipient of the prestigious Rhodes Scholarship. He enjoys a glowing reputation in the law industry and is one of the top corporate lawyers in the world.
Some of Chen’s outstanding peers are already Ministers today. These include Dr Vivian Balakrishnan, Minister of Community Development, Youth and Sports; and Lui Tuck Yew, Minister of Information, Communications and the Arts. The three of them are of the same age and came from the same batch of ACS students. Chen was also the first batch of NJC graduates together with Dr. Vivian Balakrishnan.
Chen admits frankly that he has considered joining the PAP prior to joining politics. He has quite a number of politically active friends who are PAP members, and hence have been approached by them and gave it some consideration. However, he firmly believes that he can serve Singapore all the same no matter which party he decides to join.
He says, “Those friends of mine who have joined the PAP are definitely in a better position to contribute to the society in the short term, because they can participate in making and implementing policies. So I believe that they have a more direct influence on the livelihoods of Singaporeans in the short-term. For example, he can reduce the fees of this service, and that can indeed benefit many people.”
“This is something that we (opposition parties) can’t do. However, we have another job at hand, that is promoting the system of democracy, develop the opposition parties, this is something that we need people for, and perhaps even a taller order, that is, the difficulty of attracting people to do the job. This, perhaps, is more important for Singapore in the long term, and has the potential to have a larger impact on the livelihoods of Singaporeans. From this perspective, this is perhaps a more meaningful and worthwhile endeavour.”
Political Observer: Chen Show Mao’s candidacy can have an inspirational effect
A political observer thinks that compared with the five heavyweight candidates (Heng Swee Keat, Chan Chun Sing, Tan Chuan Jin, Ong Ye Kung and Wong Ann Chai) who have similar backgrounds from public service, Chen’s multi-disciplinary economics and law background with experience from private corporations and global business is precisely what is lacking in Singapore’s current crop of leaders.
Eugene Tan, Assistant Professor of Law at SMU, says, “Judging from the education background and professional achievements, Chen can be easily linked with the current system. If he were a PAP candidate, he wouldn’t have attracted such attention; but probably because he’s an opposition party candidate, he is really raising some eyebrows.”
Tan believes that Chen is possibly the first mainstream elite to have led the way to join an opposition party. If Chen stands for elections, it will definitely be an inspiration to others who share similar characteristics, to join his efforts in promoting the development of opposition party politics.
He says, “There are some organised opposition parties that have organised themselves to create an image of credibility and seriousness. Chen can possibly become a poster boy for such opposition politics. The key is, will he continue to go against the flow? If he doesn’t get elected, will he still stand for the next elections?”
This question has already been answered by Chen during the interview, when he said that he will continue his work in WP to prepare for the next elections, in the event that he fails to get elected.
————–
Part 4
Q&A
Personal Beliefs
My personal beliefs are pretty simple: progress can only be brought about by competition. In the end, only through the growth of the opposition party, can there be a watchdog effect on the government. Under our current system, I believe that an opposition party that has the capability to govern, will complement the operation of the Singapore democratic system. Just like when you buy something, today’s newspapers said “buy one get one free” (referring to DPM Teo’s idea that when you vote for PAP, you can also have an opposition member serving as NCMP). Then I must remind everybody that it’s better to compare and shop around. There is only one big store around today, it’s quite difficult to “compare and shop”, since there is no real choice.
Conditions for Democracy
Compared with many other countries, we do have a pretty mature environment to build a democratic government. Some countries need to change their system to become a democracy, while our system and structure are already in place, and everybody accepts its legality in general. We have a parliament, the democracy system is present, the machine is present, but the problem is that nobody is operating it. Our democracy cannot get going. So we present ourselves to offer voters a choice, to allow the system a chance to work, this is something very worth doing.
Second Half of My Life
The Singapore journey from third world to first world has yet to be finished. There is a saying that to complete a hundred miles, 90 miles is but halfway through, the most difficult portion is the final ten miles, that’s why I feel that it’s very important. We must be able to move towards this goal, to work hard towards building a first world parliament. We must not negate PAP’s achievements in nation-building, but we must move on to the next stage of development, to allow our democratic system to work, to really bring us to First World.
What perspectives do bring to the table?
My extended time spent living and working overseas allows me to realise that there is plenty for us to learn from no matter which country it is. How can being a lawyer benefit voters? I think part of my profession makes me more careful. Because I act on behalf of my clients, and am used to represent them to fight for their benefits, and hence “will stay loyal in my clients best interest”. Lawyers are used to playing this role, which is also the role of an MP. I’m a corporate lawyer, we help to close business deals. So I think I’m used to observing the situation, and is quite capable of understanding people’s needs. If I get elected, I think these characteristics will be helpful to serve the ward.
What are your views on the new system of NCMP
This is the wishful thinking of the ruling party, in an attempt to satisfy Singaporeans’ desire to see somebody criticise the government in the parliament, while having the ruling party to present all the voters. I feel that voters must make a decision. That is to say, if we believe that having opposition parties to keep the government in check to bring about progress, then how shall we achieve this goal? Should there be a multi-party parliament, or will having some NCMPs suffice? NCMPs do not represent any voters, I believe that if we simply rely on them, then we have moved further away from the goal of having an opposition party that is capable of forming the government to perform watchdog functions. Is having opposition party members as NCMPs in parliament good enough? Or to make it even easier, we don’t need a parliament. We can just set up a huge mailbox for people to send their grouses about the government directly to this mailbox. Isn’t that even better? But can this encourage the ruling party to do better?
Democracy lacks efficiency?
A dominant party is efficient in executing policies, but what effects has this brought about? What are our most important policies In recent years? Yes, it is the foreign labour policy. To let in foreign labour is to spur the economy, without concern about productivity that we’ve previously talked about. This policy has created a crude economic growth, and what is the price? It is the jobs, education, housing, living space, transportation of Singaporeans. These are all part of the price that we’ve paid.
Before the implementation of this policy, what form of discussion have we had? You have heard that Singapore plans to house a population of 6.5 million in the future, but not everybody is sure that this is indeed our policy. Such an important policy, are people consulted for a discussion? Didn’t they know that this will have a great impact on the lives on Singaporeans? To me, this discussion is insufficient. Even if having multiple parties in the Parliament affects efficiency, but to have a debate in the Parliament for huge policy decisions, is this inefficiency a fair price to pay? I think it’s worth it. The ruling party’s job can be improved, as opposition parties get better, with the opportunity to gain experience to perform the checks and balances in a democracy.
————–
Chen Show Mao
Age: 50
Family: Married, with 3 children
Languages spoken: English, Mandarin, Hokkien
Basic education: Nanyang Primary School, Catholic High, ACS, NJC
Higher Education: Bachelor of Economics, Harvard. Bachelors and
Masters of Law, Oxford (Rhodes Scholarship), JD from Stanford Law
School.
From the Singapore Management University website:
Mr Chen graduated in 1986 from Harvard College and in 1988 from Corpus Christi College, Oxford University, where he was a Rhodes Scholar. In 1992 he received his J.D. from Stanford Law School and in 2005 received his M.A. from Corpus Christi College, Oxford University.
Mr Chen has extensive experience in international securities offerings and M&A transactions. He advised the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC) on its recent $21 billion initial public offering, which is the largest IPO ever, and the first global offering that involved a concurrent listing in China. He also advised ICBC on the $3.8 billion strategic investment in the bank by a consortium comprising Goldman Sachs, American Express and Allianz, which is the largest-ever investment in a Chinese financial institution.
He advised China National Offshore Oil Company (CNOOC) on its proposed $19 billion acquisition of Unocal, which is the largest-ever attempted takeover by a Chinese company. He completed the global initial public offerings of Air China, China Construction Bank, Sinopec, China Unicom, Chalco, Baidu.com and others, as well as offerings of sovereign debt by the Ministry of Finance of the People’s Republic of China.
Mr Chen has worked on a broad range of securities offerings and M&A transactions by Taiwan companies, including Acer, ASE, ASUS, AU Optronics, China Steel, Chinatrust Bank, Far EasTone, HTC, Hon Hai Precision, Inotera, Nanya Technology, Quanta Computer, Taishin Bank, TSMC, UMC and others. He also advised the Ministry of Economic Affairs of the ROC, the Development Fund of the Executive Yuan of the ROC and the Taiwan Stock Exchange on securities law matters.
Singaporeans anxious over high home prices
Singaporeans anxious over high home prices
Some city state residents blame influx of foreigners
Reuters
Mar 30, 2011

Wendy Cheng has been trying to buy a home for over two years but without success.
Cheng and her American teacher husband cannot afford property on the open market where a government-built apartment can fetch as much as S$700,000 (HK$4.3 million), and they have been unsuccessful in balloting for flats available from the state at a lower price.
At her last attempt to buy an apartment directly from Singapore’s Housing Development Board (HDB), she was given a queue number of 1,983 for the 200 flats offered, which meant she could get one only if 1,783 of the people before her dropped out.
“It’s like trying to win the lottery,” she said of her efforts to buy her own place, a predicament shared by an increasing number of young Singaporeans who feel they can no longer afford homes, unlike their parents’ generation.
With general elections likely to be called soon, soaring property prices in Singapore pose not just an economic risk but a political issue that could erode support for Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s ruling People’s Action Party.
Singapore private home prices rose 17.6 per cent last year despite government attempts to cool the market in February and August. Resale prices of HDB apartments that house more than 80 per cent of the population gained 14 per cent.
The city state’s median household income rose a much smaller 3.1 per cent, or 0.3 per cent after adjusting for inflation, to S$5,000 a month last year. Singapore, Asia’s second-largest financial centre after Hong Kong, has one of the world’s highest rate of home ownership at 87 per cent, thanks to a home-building programme to provide cheap housing for its citizens that began in the late 1960s.
But the HDB is building fewer flats and charging more for them. Prices of both resale HDB apartments and private property have also soared due to an influx of foreigners in recent years.
“The high property prices, especially for private homes, is a festering source of disappointment, unhappiness and perhaps anger among voters,” said Eugene Tan, a law lecturer at Singapore Management University. “Parents are also concerned with how their children are going to afford comparable homes in the future. The angst and anxieties are made worse by the view that foreigners are pushing up property prices.”
Foreigners now make up 36 per cent of Singapore’s population of 5.1 million, up from around 20 per cent of 4 million people a decade earlier, after the government made it easier for foreigners to work in the country.
Besides the large foreign influx, many Singaporeans also blame higher property prices on the sharp drop in HDB construction after the government agency moved to a build-to-order policy several years ago.
Singapore’s lively internet community, more critical of the government than the city state’s newspapers, note the sharp rise in immigration coincided with a drop in new dwelling homes built by the HDB.
According to HDB data, the government agency completed an average of 3,600 apartments a year between 2006 and 2008 compared with more than 11,000 flats per annum in 2001 to 2005.
“Our pay hasn’t doubled but the prices of flats have more than doubled, even for new HDB flats,” said Cheng is a 32- year-old former teacher who switched to part-time work after she had a baby last year. Her family is living with her parents.
Kelvin Tay, chief investment strategist for Singapore at UBS’ private bank, said property prices were supported by low interest rates and the market could correct sharply if borrowing costs rose to more normal levels of around 3.5 per cent.
The city state’s banks at present pay less than 0.2 per cent annual interest on deposits, while homebuyers can get housing loans for as little as 0.8 per cent per annum for the first year and about 1.5 per cent thereafter. Inflation, meanwhile, is running at 5 per cent.
The low mortgage rates have made prices affordable.
For example, after paying a minimum downpayment of 20 per cent for a S$1 million apartment in the suburbs, the going price for many newly launched flats, a person can borrow S$800,000 over 30 years and pay around S$2,500 a month, assuming a housing loan rate of 1 per cent per annum.
The monthly payments soar to around S$3,600 a month if the rate rises to 3.5 per cent per annum, according to an interest rate table provided by propertyguru.com.sg, a popular internet housing site.
The government is aware Singaporeans are concerned about high home prices, and has stepped up construction of HDB apartments and increased subsidies for first-time homebuyers in the lower-income groups.
It also introduced tough new measures on January 13 that included tougher borrowing limits and a hefty stamp duty of 16 per cent of the selling price for those who buy and sell within 12 months, aiming to clamp down on speculators. New private homes sales remained high at 1,101 flats in February compared with 1,209 in January.
Francis Seow on Kwa Geok Choo
Quote of the Week
“A hawker selling char kuay teow would, upon seeing me, give two eggs instead of one.”
~ Lee Kuan Yew
Omertà

Omertà is a popular attitude and code of honor, common in areas of southern Italy, such as Sicily, Apulia, Calabria, and Campania, where criminal organizations like the Mafia, ‘Ndrangheta, Sacra Corona Unita, and Camorra are strong. A common definition is the “code of silence”.
Omertà implies “the categorical prohibition of cooperation with state authorities or reliance on its services, even when one has been victim of a crime.” Even if somebody is convicted for a crime he has not committed, he is supposed to serve the sentence without giving the police any information about the real criminal, even if that criminal has nothing to do with the Mafia himself.
Within Mafia culture, breaking omertà is punishable by death.
Omertà is an extreme form of loyalty and solidarity in the face of authority. One of its absolute tenets is that it is deeply demeaning and shameful to betray even one’s deadliest enemy to the authorities. Observers of the mafia debate whether omertà should best be understood as an expression of social consensus surrounding the mafia or whether it is instead a pragmatic response based primarily on fear. The point is succinctly made in a popular Sicilian proverb “Cu è surdu, orbu e taci, campa cent’anni ‘mpaci” (“He who is deaf, blind, and silent will live a hundred years in peace”).
Marshall never loses
“We have lost sight of the joy and excitement of public service, helping our fellow men. The joy and excitement of seeking and understanding of the joy of the miracle of the living, the duty and the grandeur. We have lost taste for heroic action in the service of our people.”
~ David Marshall (1908-1995) (Link to 1994 interview)
A Few Good Men – You Can’t Handle The Truth
IHT and NYT Interview Lee Kuan Yew
The following is the transcript of the interview Seth Mydans had with Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew, for the New York Times and the International Herald Tribune. The interview was held on 1 September 2010.

Mr Lee: “Thank you. When you are coming to 87, you are not very happy..”
Q: “Not. Well you should be glad that you’ve gotten way past where most of us will get.”
Mr Lee: “That is my trouble. So, when is the last leaf falling?”
Q: “Do you feel like that, do you feel like the leaves are coming off?”
Mr Lee: “Well, yes. I mean I can feel the gradual decline of energy and vitality and I mean generally every year when you know you are not on the same level as last year. But that is life.”
Q: “My mother used to say never get old.”
Mr Lee: “Well, there you will try never to think yourself old. I mean I keep fit, I swim, I cycle.”
Q: “And yoga, is that right? Meditation?”
Mr Lee: “Yes.”
Q: “Tell me about meditation?”
Mr Lee: “Well, I started it about two, three years ago when Ng Kok Song, the Chief Investment Officer of the Government of Singapore Investment Corporation, I knew he was doing meditation. His wife had died but he was completely serene. So, I said, how do you achieve this? He said I meditate everyday and so did my wife and when she was dying of cancer, she was totally serene because she meditated everyday and he gave me a video of her in her last few weeks completely composed completely relaxed and she and him had been meditating for years. Well, I said to him, you teach me. He is a devout Christian. He was taught by a man called Laurence Freeman, a Catholic. His guru was John Main a devout Catholic. When I was in London, Ng Kok Song introduced me to Laurence Freeman. In fact, he is coming on Saturday to visit Singapore, and we will do a meditation session. The problem is to keep the monkey mind from running off into all kinds of thoughts. It is most difficult to stay focused on the mantra. The discipline is to have a mantra which you keep repeating in your innermost heart, no need to voice it over and over again throughout the whole period of meditation. The mantra they recommended was a religious one. Ma Ra Na Ta, four syllables. Come To Me Oh Lord Jesus. So I said Okay, I am not a Catholic but I will try. He said you can take any other mantra, Buddhist Om Mi Tuo Fo, and keep repeating it. To me Ma Ran Na Ta is more soothing. So I used Ma Ra Na Ta. You must be disciplined. I find it helps me go to sleep after that. A certain tranquility settles over you. The day’s pressures and worries are pushed out. Then there’s less problem sleeping. I miss it sometimes when I am tired, or have gone out to a dinner and had wine. Then I cannot concentrate. Otherwise I stick to it.”
Q: “So…”
Mr Lee: “.. for a good meditator will do it for half-an-hour. I do it for 20 minutes.”
Q: “So, would you say like your friend who taught you, would you say you are serene?”
Mr Lee: “Well, not as serene as he is. He has done it for many years and he is a devout Catholic. That makes a difference. He believes in Jesus. He believes in the teachings of the Bible. He has lost his wife, a great calamity. But the wife was serene. He gave me this video to show how meditation helped her in her last few months. I do not think I can achieve his level of serenity. But I do achieve some composure.”
Q: “And do you find that at this time in your life you do find yourself getting closer to religion of one sort or another?”
Mr Lee: “I am an agnostic. I was brought up in a traditional Chinese family with ancestor worship. I would go to my grandfather’s grave on All Soul’s Day which is called “Qingming”. My father would bring me along, lay out food and candles and burn some paper money and kowtow three times over his tombstone. At home on specific days outside the kitchen he would put up two candles with my grandfather’s picture. But as I grew up, I questioned this because I think this is superstition. You are gone, you burn paper money, how can he collect the paper money where he is? After my father died, I dropped the practice. My youngest brother baptised my father as a Christian. He did not have the right to. He was a doctor and for the last weeks before my father’s life, he took my father to his house because he was a doctor and was able to keep my father comforted. I do not know if my father was fully aware when he was converted into Christianity.”
Q: “Converted your father?”
Mr Lee: “Yes.”
Q: “Well this happens when you get close to the end.”
Mr Lee: “Well, but I do not know whether my father agreed. At that time he may have been beyond making a rational decision. My brother assumed that he agreed and converted him.”
Q: “But…”
Mr Lee: “I am not converted.”
Q: “But when you reach that stage, you may wonder more than ever what is next?”
Mr Lee: “Well, what is next, I do not know. Nobody has ever come back. The Muslims say that there are seventy houris, beautiful women up there. But nobody has come back to confirm this.”
Q: “And you haven’t converted to Islam, knowing that?”
Mr Lee: “Most unlikely. The Buddhist believes in transmigration of the soul. If you live a good life, the reward is in your next migration, you will be a good being, not an ugly animal. It is a comforting thought, but my wife and I do not believe in it. She has been for two years bed-ridden, unable to speak after a series of strokes. I am not going to convert her. I am not going to allow anybody to convert her because I know it will be against what she believed in all her life. How do I comfort myself? Well, I say life is just like that. You can’t choose how you go unless you are going to take an overdose of sleeping pills, like sodium amytal. For just over two years, she has been inert in bed, but still cognitive. She understands when I talk to her, which I do every night. She keeps awake for me; I tell her about my day’s work, read her favourite poems.”
Q: ‘And what kind of books do you read to her?”
Mr Lee: “So much of my time is reading things online. The latest book which I want to read or re-read is Kim. It is a beautiful of description of India as it was in Kipling’s time. And he had an insight into the Indian mind and it is still basically that same society that I find when I visit India. “
Q: “When you spoke to Time Magazine a couple of years ago, you said Don Quixote was your favourite?”
Mr Lee: “Yes, I was just given the book, Don Quixote, a new translation.”
Q: “But people might find that ironic because he was fantasist who did not realistically choose his projects and you are sort of the opposite?”
Mr Lee: “No, no, you must have something fanciful and a flight of fancy. I had a colleague Rajaratnam who read Sci-Fi for his leisure.”’
Q: “And you?”:
Mr Lee: “No, I do not believe in Sci-Fi.”
Q: “But you must have something to fantasise.”
Mr Lee: “Well, at the moment, as I said, I would like to read Kim again. Why I thought of Kim was because I have just been through a list of audio books to choose for my wife. Jane Austen, Emily Bronte, books she has on her book shelf. So, I ticked off the ones I think she would find interesting. The one that caught my eye was Kim. She was into literature, from Alice in Wonderland, to Adventures with a Looking Glass, to Jane Austen’s Persuasion, Pride and Prejudice, and Sense and Sensibility. Jane Austen was her favourite writer because she wrote elegant and leisurely English prose of the 19th century. The prose flowed beautifully, described the human condition in a graceful way, and rolls off the tongue and in the mind. She enjoyed it. Also Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales. She was an English Literature major.”
Q: “You are naming books on the list, not necessarily books you have already read, yes?”
Mr Lee: “I would have read some of them.”
Q: “Like a Jane Austen book, or Canterbury Tales?”
Mr Lee: “No, Canterbury Tales, I had to do it for my second year English Literature course in Raffles College. For a person in the 15th Century, he wrote very modern stuff. I didn’t find his English all that archaic. I find those Scottish poets difficult to read. Sometimes I don’t make sense of their Scottish brogue. My wife makes sense of them. Then Shakespeare’s sonnets.”
Q: “You read those?”
Mr Lee: “I read those sonnets when I did English literature in my freshman’s year. She read them.”
Q: “When you say she reads them now, you’re the one who reads them, yes?”
Mr Lee: “Yes, I read them to her.”
Q: “But you go to her.”
Mr Lee: “Yes, I read from an Anthology of Poems which she has, and several other anthologies. So I know her favourite poems. She had flagged them. I read them to her.”
Q: “She’s in the hospital? You go to the hospital?”
Mr Lee: “No, no, she’s at home. We’ve got a hospital bed and nurses attending to her. We used to share the same room. Now I’m staying in the next room. I have to get used to her groans and grunts when she’s uncomfortable from a dry throat and they pump in a spray moisture called “Biothene” which soothes her throat, and they suck out phlegm. Because she can’t get up, she can’t breathe fully. The phlegm accumulates in the chest but you can’t suck it out from the chest, you’ve got to wait until she coughs and it goes out to her throat. They suck it out, and she’s relieved. They sit her up and tap her back. It’s very distressing, but that’s life.”
Q: “Yes, your daughter on Sunday wrote a moving column, movingly about the situation referring to you.”
Mr Lee: “How did you come to read it?”
Q: “Somebody said you’ve got to read that column, so I read it.”
Mr Lee: “You don’t get the Straits Times.”
Q: “I get it online actually. I certainly do, I follow Singapore online and she wrote that the whole family suffers of course from this and she wrote the one who’s been hurting the most and is yet carrying on stoically is my father.”
Mr Lee: “What to do? What else can I do? I can’t break down. Life has got to go on. I try to busy myself, but from time to time in idle moments, my mind goes back to the happy days we were up and about together.”
Q: “When you go to visit her, is that the time when your mind goes back?”
Mr Lee: “No, not then. My daughter’s fished out many old photographs for this piece she wrote and picked out a dozen or two dozen photographs from the digital copies which somebody had kept at the Singapore Press Holdings. When I look at them, I thought how lucky I was. I had 61 years of happiness. We’ve got to go sometime, so I’m not sure who’s going first, whether she or me. So I told her, I’ve been looking at the marriage vows of the Christians. The best I read was,” To love, to hold and to cherish, in sickness and in health, for better or for worse, till death do us part.” I told her I would try and keep you company for as long as I can. She understood.”
Q: “Yes, it’s been really.”
Mr Lee: “What to do? What can you do in this situation? I can say get rid of the nurses. Then the maids won’t know how to turn her over and then she gets pneumonia. That ends the suffering. But human beings being what we are, I do the best for her and the best is to give her a competent nurse who moves her, massages her, turns her over, so no bed sores. I’ve got a hospital bed with air cushions so no bed sores. Well, that’s life. Make her comfortable.”
Q: “And for yourself, you feel the weight of age more than you have in the past?”
Mr Lee: “I’m not sure. I marginally must have. It’s stress. However, I look at it, I mean, it’s stress. That’s life. But it’s a different kind of stress from the kind of stress I faced, political stresses. Dire situations for Singapore, dire situations for myself when we broke off from Malaysia, the Malays in Singapore could have rioted and gone for me and they suddenly found themselves back as a minority because the Tunku kicked us out. That’s different, that’s intense stress and it’s over but this is stress which goes on. One doctor told me, you may think that when she’s gone you’re relieved but you’ll be sad when she’s gone because there’s still the human being here, there’s still somebody you talk to and she knows what you’re saying and you’ll miss that. Well, I don’t know, I haven’t come to that but I think I’ll probably will because it’s now two years, May, June, July, August, September, two years and four months. It’s become a part of my life.”
Q: “She’s how old now?”
Mr Lee: “She’s two-and-a-half years older than me, so she’s coming on to 90.”
Q: “But you did make a reference in an interview with Time magazine to something that goes beyond reason as you put it. You referred to the real enemy by Pierre D’Harcourt who talked about people surviving the Nazi, it’s better that they have something to believe in.”
Mr Lee: “Yes, of course.”
Q: “And you said that the Communists and the deeply religious fought on and survived. There are some things in the human spirit that are beyond reason.”
Mr Lee: “I believe that to be true. Look, I saw my friend and cabinet colleague who’s a deeply religious Catholic. He was Finance Minister, a fine man. In 1983, he had a heart attack. He was in hospital, in ICU, he improved and was taken out of ICU. Then he had a second heart attack and I knew it was bad. I went to see him and the priest was giving him the last rites as a Catholic. Absolutely fearless, he showed no distress, no fear, the family was around him, his wife and daughters, he had four daughters. With priest delivering the last rites, he knew he was reaching the end. But his mind was clear but absolutely calm.”
Q: “Well, I am more like you. We don’t have something to cling to.”
Mr Lee: “That’s our problem.”
Q: “But also the way people see you is supremely reasonable person, reason is the ultimate.”
Mr Lee: “Well, that’s the way I’ve been working.”
Q: “Well, you did mention to Tom Plate, they think they know me but they only know the public me?”
Mr Lee: “Yeah, the private view is you have emotions for your close members of your family. We are a close family, not just my sons and my wife and my parents but my brothers and my sister. So my youngest brother, a doctor as I told you, he just sent me an email that my second brother was dying of a bleeding colon, diverticulitis. And later the third brother now has got prostate cancer and has spread into his lymph nodes. So I asked what’re the chances of survival. It’s not gotten to the bones yet, so they’re doing chemotherapy and if you can prevent it from going into the bones, he’ll be okay for a few more years. If it does get to the bones, then that’s the end. I don’t think my brother knows. But I’ll probably go and see him.”
Q: “But you yourself have been fit. You have a stent, you had heart problem late last year but besides that do you have ailments?”
Mr Lee: “Well, aches and pains of a geriatric person, joints, muscles but all non-terminal. I go in for a physiotherapy, maintenance once a week, they give me a rub over because when I cycle, my thighs get sore, knees get a little painful, and so the hips.”
Q: “These are the signs of age.”
Mr Lee: “Yeah, of course.”
Q: “I’m 64. I’m beginning to feel that and I don’t like it and I don’t want to admit to myself.”
Mr Lee: “But if you stop exercising, you make it worse. That’s what my doctors tell me, just carry on. When you have these aches and pains, we’ll give you physiotherapy. I’ve learnt to use heat pads at home. So after the physiotherapy, once a week, if I feel my thighs are sore, I just have a heat pad there. You put in the microwave oven and you tie it around your thighs or your ankles or your calves. It relieves the pain.”
Q: “So you continue to cycle.”
Mr Lee: “Oh yeah.”
Q: “Treadmill?
Mr Lee: “No, I don’t do the treadmill. I walk but not always. When I’ve cycled enough I don’t walk.”
Q: “That’s your primary exercise, swimming?”
Mr Lee: “Yeah, I swim everyday, it’s relaxing.”
Q: “What other secrets, I see you drink hot water?”
Mr Lee: “Yes.”
Q: “Tell me about it.”
Mr Lee: “Well, I used to drink tea but tea is a diuretic, but I didn’t know that. I used to drink litres of it. In the 1980s, I was having a conference with Zhou Ziyang who was then Secretary-General of the Communist Party in the Great Hall of the People. The Chinese came in and poured more tea and hot water. I was scoffing it down because it kept my throat moistened, my BP was up because more liquid was in me. Halfway through, I said please stop. I’m dashing off. I had to relief myself. Then my doctors said don’t you know that tea is a diuretic? I don’t like coffee, it gives me a sour stomach, so okay, let’s switch to water.”
Q: “You know you had the hot water when I met you a couple of years ago and after I told my wife about that, she switched to hot water. She’s not sure why except that you drink hot water, so she’s decided to.”
Mr Lee: “Well, cold water, this was from my ENT man. If you drink cold water, you reduce the temperature of your nasal passages and throat and reduce your resistance to coughs and colds. So I take warm water, body temperature. I don’t scald myself with boiling hot water. I avoid that. But my daughter puts blocks of ice into her coffee and drinks it up. She’s all right, she’s only 50-plus.
Q: “Let me ask a question about the outside world a little bit. Singapore is a great success story even though people criticize this and that. When you look back, you can be proud of what you’ve done and I assume you are. Are there things that you regret, things that you wished you could achieve that you couldn’t?”
Mr Lee: “Well, first I regret having been turfed out of Malaysia. I think if the Tunku had kept us together, what we did in Singapore, had Malaysia accepted a multiracial base for their society, much of what we’ve achieved in Singapore would be achieved in Malaysia. But not as much because it’s a much broader base. We would have improved inter-racial relations and an improved holistic situation. Now we have a very polarized Malaysia, Malays, Chinese and Indians in separate schools, living separate lives and not really getting on with one another. You read them. That’s bad for us as close neighbours.”
Q: “So at that time, you found yourself with Singapore and you have transformed it. And my question would be how do you assess your own satisfaction with what you’ve achieved? What didn’t work?”
Mr Lee: “Well, the greatest satisfaction I had was my colleagues and I, were of that generation who were turfed out of Malaysia suffered two years under a racial policy decided that we will go the other way. We will not as a majority squeeze the minority because once we’re by ourselves, the Chinese become the majority. We made quite sure whatever your race, language or religion, you are an equal citizen and we’ll drum that into the people and I think our Chinese understand and today we have an integrated society. Our Malays are English-educated, they’re no longer like the Malays in Malaysia and you can see there are some still wearing headscarves but very modern looking.”
Q: “That doesn’t sound like a regret to me.”
Mr Lee: “No, no, but the regret is there’s such a narrow base to build this enormous edifice, so I’ve got to tell the next generation, please do not take for granted what’s been built. If you forget that this is a small island which we are built upon and reach a 100 storeys high tower block and may go up to 150 if you are wise. But if you believe that it’s permanent, it will come tumbling down and you will never get a second chance.”
Q: “I wonder if that is a concern of yours about the next generation. I saw your discussion with a group of young people before the last election and they were saying what they want is a lot of these values from the West, an open political marketplace and even playing field in all of these things and you said well, if that’s the way you feel, I’m very sad.”
Mr Lee: “Because you play it that way, if you have dissension, if you chose the easy way to Muslim votes and switch to racial politics, this society is finished. The easiest way to get majority vote is vote for me, we’re Chinese, they’re Indians, they’re Malays. Our society will be ripped apart. If you do not have a cohesive society, you cannot make progress.”
Q: “But is that a concern that the younger generation doesn’t realize as much as it should?”
Mr Lee: “I believe they have come to believe that this is a natural state of affairs, and they can take liberties with it. They think you can put it on auto-pilot. I know that is never so. We have crafted a set of very intricate rules, no housing blocks shall have more than a percentage of so many Chinese, so many percent Malays, Indians. All are thoroughly mixed. Willy-nilly, your neighbours are Indians, Malays, you go to the same shopping malls, you go to the same schools, the same playing fields, you go up and down the same lifts. We cannot allow segregation.”
Q: “There are people who think that Singapore may lighten up a little bit when you go, that the rules will become a little looser and if that happens, that might be something that’s a concern to you.”
Mr Lee: “No, you can go looser where it’s not race, language and religion because those are deeply gut issues and it will surface the moment you start playing on them. It’s inevitable, but on other areas, policies, right or wrong, disparity of opportunities, rich and poor, well go ahead. But don’t play race, language, religion. We’ve got here, we’ve become cohesive, keep it that way. We’ve not used Chinese as a majority language because it will split the population. We have English as our working language, it’s equal for everybody, and it’s given us the progress because we’re connected to the world. If you want to keep your Malay, or your Chinese, or your Tamil, Urdu or whatever, do that as a second language, not equal to your first language. It’s up to you, how high a standard you want to achieve.”
Q: “The public view of you is as a very strict, cerebral, unsentimental. Catherine Lim, “an authoritarian, no-nonsense manner that has little use for sentiment”.”
Mr Lee: “She’s a novelist, therefore, she simplifies a person’s character, make graphic caricature of me. But is anybody that simple or simplistic?”
Q: “Sentiment though, you don’t show that very much in public.”
Mr Lee: “Well, that’s a Chinese ideal. A gentleman in Chinese ideal, the junzi (君子) is someone who is always composed and possessed of himself and doesn’t lose his temper and doesn’t lose his tongue. That’s what I try to do, except when I got turfed out from Malaysia. Then, I just couldn’t help it.”
Q: “One aspect of the way you’ve constructed Singapore is a certain level of fear perhaps in the population. You described yourself as a street fighter, knuckle duster and so forth.”
Mr Lee: “Yes.”
Q: “And that produces among some people a level of fear and I want to tell you what a taxi driver said when I said I was going to interview you. He said, safer not to ask him anything. If you ask him, somebody will follow you. We’re not in politics so just let him do the politics.”
Mr Lee: “How old is he?’
Q: “I’m sorry, middle aged, I don’t know.”
Mr Lee: “I go out. I’m no longer the Prime Minister. I don’t have to do the difficult things. Everybody wants to shake my hands, everybody wants me to autograph something. Everybody wants to get around me to take a photo. So it’s a problem.
Q: “Yes but…”
Mr Lee: “Because I’m no longer in charge, I don’t have to do the hard things. I’ve laid the foundation and they know that because of that foundation, they’re enjoying this life.’
Q: “So when you were the one directly in-charge, you had to be tough, you had to be a fighter.”
Mr Lee: “Yes, of course. I had to fight left-wingers, Communists, pro-Communist groups who had killer squads. If I didn’t have the guts and the gumption to take them on, there wouldn’t be the Singapore. They would have taken over and it would have collapsed. I also had to fight the Malay Ultras when we were in Malaysia for two years.”
Q: “Well, you don’t have a lot of dissidents in prison but you’re known for your libel suits which keeps a lot of people at bay.”
Mr Lee: “We are non-corrupt. We lead modest lives, so it’s difficult to malign us. What’s the easy way to get a leader down? He’s a hypocrite, he is corrupt, he pretends to be this when in fact he’s that. That’s what they’re trying to do to me. Well, prove it, if what you say is right, then I don’t deserve this reputation. Why must you say these things without foundation? I’m taking you to court, you’ve made these allegations, I’m open to your cross-examination.”
Q: “But that may produce what I was talking about, about a level of fear.”
Mr Lee: “No, you’re fearful of a libel suit? Then don’t issue these defamatory statements or make them where you have no basis. The Western correspondent, especially those who hop in and hop out got to find something to show that they are impartial, that they’re not just taken in by the Singapore growth story. They say we keep down the opposition, how? Libel suits. Absolute rubbish. We have opponents in Parliament who have attacked us on policy, no libel suits against them and even in Parliament they are privileged to make defamatory allegation and cannot be sued. But they don’t. They know it is not true.”
Q: “Let me ask a last question. Again back to Tom Plate, “I’m not serious all the time. Everyone needs to have a good laugh now and then to see the funny side of things and to laugh at himself”.”
Mr Lee: “Yes, of course.”
Q: “How about that?”
Mr Lee: “You have to be that.”
Q: “So what makes you laugh?”
Mr Lee: “Many things, the absurdity of it, many things in life. Sometimes, I meet witty people, have conversations, they make sharp remarks, I laugh.
Q: “And when you laugh at yourself as you said?”
Mr Lee: “That’s very frequent. Yeah, I’m reaching 87, trying to keep fit, presenting a vigorous figure and it’s an effort and is it worth the effort? I laugh at myself trying to keep a bold front. It’s become my habit. I just carry on.”
Q: “So it’s the whole broad picture of things that you find funny?”
Mr Lee: “Yes, life as a whole has many abnormalities, of course.”
Q: “Your public life together with your private life, what you’ve done over things people write about you and Singapore, that overall is something that you can find funny?”
Mr Lee: “Yes, of course.
Q: “You made one of the few people who laugh at Singapore.”
Mr Lee: “Let me give you a Chinese proverb “do not judge a man until you’ve closed his coffin. Do not judge a man.” Close the coffin, then decide. Then you assess him. I may still do something foolish before the lid is closed on me.”
Q: “So you’re waiting for the final verdict?”
Mr Lee: “No, the final verdict will not be in the obituaries. The final verdict will be when the PhD students dig out the archives, read my old papers, assess what my enemies have said, sift the evidence and seek the truth? I’m not saying that everything I did was right, but everything I did was for an honourable purpose. I had to do some nasty things, locking fellows up without trial.”
Q: “For the greater good?
Mr Lee: “Well, yes, because otherwise they are running around and causing havoc playing on Chinese language and culture, and accusing me of destroying Chinese education. You’ve not been here when the Communists were running around. They do not believe in the democratic process. They don’t believe in one man, one vote. They believe in one bullet, one vote. They had killer squads. But they at the same time had a united front exploiting the democratic game. It gave them cover. But my business, my job was to make sure that they did not succeed. Sometimes you just got to lock the leaders up. They are confusing the people. The reality is that if you allow these people to work up animosity against the government because it’s keeping down the Chinese language, because we’ve promoted English, keeping down Chinese culture because you have allowed English literature, and we suppress our Chinese values and the Chinese language, the Chinese press, well, you will break up the society. They harp on these things when they know they are not true. They know that if you actually do in Chinese language and culture, the Chinese will riot and the society must break up.”
Q: “So leadership is a constant battle?”
Mr Lee: “In a multiracial situation like this, it is. Malaysia took the different line; Malaysians saw it as a Malay country, all others are lodgers, “orang tumpangan”, and they the Bumiputras, sons of the soil, run the show. So the Sultans, the Chief Justice and judges, generals, police commissioner, the whole hierarchy is Malay. All the big contracts for Malays. Malay is the language of the schools although it does not get them into modern knowledge. So the Chinese build and find their own independent schools to teach Chinese, the Tamils create their own Tamil schools, which do not get them jobs. It’s a most unhappy situation.”
Mdm Yeong: “I thought that was the last question.”
Q: “This is the last part of the last question. So your career has been a struggle to keep things going in the right way and you’ve also said that the best way to keep your health is to keep on working. Are you tired of it by this point? Do you feel like you want to rest?”
Mr Lee: “No, I don’t. I know if I rest I’ll slide downhill fast. No, my whole being has been stimulated by the daily challenge. If I suddenly drop it all, play golf, stroll around, watch the sunset, read novels, that’s downhill. It is the daily challenge, social contacts, meeting people, people like you, you press me, I answer, when I don’t…. what have I got tomorrow?”
Mdm Yeong: “You have two more events coming up. One is the Radin Mas Community.”
Mr Lee: “Oh yeah. I got it.”
Mdm Yeong: “And then you have other call, courtesy call on the 3rd.”
Mr Lee: “We are social animals. Without that interaction with people, you are isolated. The worst punishment you can give a person is the isolation ward. You get hallucinations. Four walls, no books, no nothing. By way of example, Henry Kissinger wants to speak to me. So I said okay, we’ll speak on Sunday. What about? We are meeting in Sao Paolo at a J P Morgan International Advisory Board. He wants to talk to me to check certain facts on China. My mind is kept alive, I go to China once a year at least. I meet Chinese leaders. So it’s a constant stimulus as I keep up to date. Supposing I sit back, I don’t think about China, just watch videos. I am off to Moscow, Kiev and Paris on the 15th of September. Three days Moscow, three days Kiev, four days Paris. Moscow I am involved in the Skolkovo Business School which President Medvedev, when he wasn’t President started. I promised to go if he did not fix it in the winter. So they fix it for September. I look at the fires, I said wow this is no good.”
Q: “It’s not going to be freezing if there are fires.”
Mr Lee: “No but our embassy says the skies have cleared. Kiev because the President has invited me specially and will fly me from Moscow to Kiev and then fly me on to Paris. Paris I am on the TOTAL Advisory Board together with Joe Nye and a few others. They want a presentation on what are China’s strengths and weaknesses. That keeps me alive. It’s just not my impressionistic views of China but one that has to be backed by facts and figures. So my team works out the facts and figures, and I check to see if they tally with my impressions. But it’s a constant stimulus to keep alive, and up-to-date. If I stop it, it’s downhill.”
Q: “Well, I hope you continue. Thank you very much, I really enjoyed this interview.”
Road Rage Singapore
<